Derecho privado y filosofia politica. Fundamentos by Martín Hevia PDF

By Martín Hevia

Show description

Read Online or Download Derecho privado y filosofia politica. Fundamentos filosoficos de la responsabilidad civil PDF

Best jurisprudence books

Download e-book for iPad: The Unity of the Common Law: Studies in Hegelian by Alan Brudner

Countering the influential view of severe felony stories that legislation is an incoherent mix of conflicting political ideologies, this publication forges a new paradigm for figuring out the typical legislations as being unified and systematic. Alan Brudner applies Hegel's felony and ethical philosophy to model a complete synthesis of the typical legislation of estate, agreement, tort, and crime.

Extra info for Derecho privado y filosofia politica. Fundamentos filosoficos de la responsabilidad civil

Sample text

2001). In general, what such studies have found is that negative stereotypes, particularly when highlighted, can become self-confirming. We can put this in terms of ability by considering several stereotypes about different groups and their capacities. For instance, women are often stereotyped as being worse at math, the elderly as being worse drivers, and African-Americans as being worse academically. When a member of one of these groups finds themselves faced with a task associated with a negative stereotype, their performance risks being evaluated in terms of that stereotype.

Govier, Trudy. 2010. A practical study of argument, 7th ed. Belmont: Wadsworth. Graham, Michael H. 1977. Impeaching the professional expert witness by showing financial interest. Indiana Law Review 53: 85–110. L. Harris, and Adam Corner. 2009. Argument content and argument source: An exploration. Informal Logic 29(4): 337–367. Hahn, Ulrike, Mike Oaksford, and Adam Harris. 2013. Testimony and argument: A Bayesian perspective. In Bayesian argumentation: The practical side of probability, ed. F. Zenker.

Stockholm: Ordfront. Salmon, Wesley. 1963. Logic. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall. Salmon, Merrilee. 2013. Introduction to logic and critical thinking, 6th ed. Boston: Cengage. Schum, David A. 1975. The weighing of testimony in judicial proceedings from sources having reduced credibility. Human Factors 17(2): 172–182. Solomon, Miriam. 1992. Scientific rationality and human reasoning. Philosophy of Science 59: 439–454. Wahlberg, Lena. 2010. Legal questions and scientific answers: Ontological differences and epistemic gaps in the assessment of causal relations.

Download PDF sample

Derecho privado y filosofia politica. Fundamentos filosoficos de la responsabilidad civil by Martín Hevia


by Brian
4.2

Rated 4.46 of 5 – based on 21 votes