By Martín Hevia
Read Online or Download Derecho privado y filosofia politica. Fundamentos filosoficos de la responsabilidad civil PDF
Best jurisprudence books
Countering the influential view of severe felony stories that legislation is an incoherent mix of conflicting political ideologies, this publication forges a new paradigm for figuring out the typical legislations as being unified and systematic. Alan Brudner applies Hegel's felony and ethical philosophy to model a complete synthesis of the typical legislation of estate, agreement, tort, and crime.
- West's Encyclopedia of American Law - A-Ba
- LSAT PrepTest 11
- Crime and Punishment in America: Almanac
- Philosophical Foundations of the Nature of Law
Extra info for Derecho privado y filosofia politica. Fundamentos filosoficos de la responsabilidad civil
2001). In general, what such studies have found is that negative stereotypes, particularly when highlighted, can become self-confirming. We can put this in terms of ability by considering several stereotypes about different groups and their capacities. For instance, women are often stereotyped as being worse at math, the elderly as being worse drivers, and African-Americans as being worse academically. When a member of one of these groups finds themselves faced with a task associated with a negative stereotype, their performance risks being evaluated in terms of that stereotype.
Govier, Trudy. 2010. A practical study of argument, 7th ed. Belmont: Wadsworth. Graham, Michael H. 1977. Impeaching the professional expert witness by showing financial interest. Indiana Law Review 53: 85–110. L. Harris, and Adam Corner. 2009. Argument content and argument source: An exploration. Informal Logic 29(4): 337–367. Hahn, Ulrike, Mike Oaksford, and Adam Harris. 2013. Testimony and argument: A Bayesian perspective. In Bayesian argumentation: The practical side of probability, ed. F. Zenker.
Stockholm: Ordfront. Salmon, Wesley. 1963. Logic. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall. Salmon, Merrilee. 2013. Introduction to logic and critical thinking, 6th ed. Boston: Cengage. Schum, David A. 1975. The weighing of testimony in judicial proceedings from sources having reduced credibility. Human Factors 17(2): 172–182. Solomon, Miriam. 1992. Scientific rationality and human reasoning. Philosophy of Science 59: 439–454. Wahlberg, Lena. 2010. Legal questions and scientific answers: Ontological differences and epistemic gaps in the assessment of causal relations.
Derecho privado y filosofia politica. Fundamentos filosoficos de la responsabilidad civil by Martín Hevia